|
A Week in the Horn 26.12.2008 |
|
In its communiqué, the Peace and Security Council reiterated its serious concern at the divisions within the TFG and in the Transitional Federal Institutions (TFIs), and welcomed the decisions of the IGAD Council of Ministers. It reaffirmed full support for Prime Minister Nur 'Adde' and his new cabinet, and condemned the attempt by President Abdullahi Yusuf to unconstitutionally appoint a new “Prime Minister”. It endorsed the November 18 IGAD Council decision to impose targeted sanctions against all those hindering the on-going efforts towards reconciliation, peace and stability in Somalia, and the previous day's decision to impose sanctions on the unconstitutionally designated “Prime Minister” and his immediate associates. The Council requested the Chairperson of the Commission to establish a committee of experts to provide a list, to be regularly updated, of targeted individuals and entities. The Council welcomed the United Nations Security Council resolution 1844 (2008) of 20 November, as well as the Kenyan Government's decision to take measures against Somali leaders hindering the political process in Somalia. The Council decided to extend the mandate of AMISOM for two more months, starting from 16 January 2009, and said AMISOM should assist in the training of the envisaged 10,000 joint TFG-ARS security force. The Council expressed its appreciation to the Ugandan and Burundian Governments for their continued commitment to the advancement of the cause of peace and reconciliation in Somalia, and to the personnel of AMISOM. It expressed its satisfaction that Uganda and Burundi were prepared to contribute an additional battalion apiece, as well as the confirmation by Nigeria of its pledge of a battalion. The Council called on other Member States to contribute troops and other personnel required for the Mission to reach its authorized strength. The Council paid tribute to Ethiopia for its invaluable contribution to the search for peace and reconciliation in Somalia and for the sacrifices it made by maintaining its troops in Somalia for two years. The Council, taking into account the decision of the Ethiopian government to withdraw its troops from Somalia by the end the year, in accordance with the Djibouti Agreement, and notes the new challenges posed by this withdrawal. In this respect, and taking into account that the withdrawal of the Ethiopian troops has already begun, Council requests the Commission to engage the Ethiopian Government as speedily as possible to ensure that all the necessary work with respect to transition is fully handled before the withdrawal of the Ethiopian troops is completed. Council further requests the Commission, in consultation with the Troop Contributing Countries to AMISOM, to develop a new concept of operations, as well as intensify its efforts to make available the required resources for the mission. The Council also called on the Security Council once again to authorize deployment of an international stabilization force and, subsequently, a peace keeping operation to take over from AMISOM and support the long-term stabilization and reconstruction of Somalia. Pending this, the Council requested the United Nations Security Council to authorize a support package for AMISOM on the basis of the UN Secretary-General's proposals of 19 December. The Council again expressed its concern at the increasing acts of piracy and armed robbery, and urged that the international community's zeal and mobilization to deal with this menace should also be displayed to bring to an end the violence and suffering in mainland Somalia. It stressed that any lasting solution to the problem of piracy and armed robbery at sea required Somalia's underlying problems be effectively and swiftly addressed. On the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) the Council heard the Report of the Chairperson of the Commission on the situation and the statements by the Special Envoy of the UN Secretary-General for DRC, Mr. Olusegun Obasanjo, former President of Nigeria, the representatives of the DRC, Kenya, in its capacity as the country chairing the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region, and the Executive Secretariat of that organization. It reiterated its deep concern at the prevailing security and humanitarian situation in Eastern DRC, and strongly condemned the declaration made by the National Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP) of dissident General Laurent Nkunda, on 1st October calling for the overthrow of the Congolese Government and rejecting the framework for the implementation of the Actes d’Engagement of Goma, the AMANI program. It condemned the numerous atrocities committed and called on the international community to take the necessary measures to bring to justice those suspected of committing human rights violations and abuses against the civilian population. It expressed appreciation for the launching of discussions between the Government and the CNDP, in Nairobi, on 8 December, and urged the parties to conduct the dialogue in a frank and constructive manner. It welcomed the joint operation undertaken by the DRC, Uganda and Sudan in the Garamba Park against the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), and underlined the urgent necessity to consolidate and deepen the progress made in the implementation of the Nairobi and the Goma processes. It requested the Chairperson of the Commission to dispatch a multidisciplinary mission to assess the situation and make recommendations for the Commission and Member States to provide increased support for reconstruction and peace building efforts in the DRC. The Peace and Security Council discussed the situation in the Islamic Republic of Mauritania following the 6 August coup there. The Council noted the release of President Sidi Ould Cheikh Abdellahi, but expressed its deep concern with the lack of political will to facilitate a return to constitutional legality. It reiterated its firm condemnation of the coup and all measures taken to consolidate the situation arising from this. It made clear the legitimacy of the institutions democratically elected in the legislative and presidential elections of November 2006 and March 2007. The Council decided that according to the relevant provisions of the Lomé Declaration of July 2000 and the Protocol Relating to the Establishment of the Peace and Security Council on Unconstitutional Changes of Government, that if constitutional order is not restored by 5 February 2009 then the Council will impose measures, including targeted sanctions, such as visa denials, travel restrictions and the freezing of assets, on all individuals, both civilian and military, whose activities are intended to maintain the unconstitutional status quo in Mauritania. The Council underlined the importance of the support of the international community to reinforce the effectiveness of the action of the AU and decided to communicate its decision to the UN Security Council to ask it to actively support the efforts of the African Union. On Guinea Bissau the Council condemned, once again, the attack on 23 November on the residence of President João Bernardo Vieira. It expressed its support to President Vieira and encouraged him to embark upon the formation of a new National Assembly, as well as a new Government, on the basis of the final results of the legislative elections of 16 November, and thereby re-establish normalcy in Guinea-Bissau's political life. The Council urgently appealed to Member States as well as to the AU’s bilateral and multilateral partners to assist Guinea Bissau in the re-organization of the security services. * * * *
* * * *
During the Forum, research papers on the principles of democratic elections, the contribution of political parties in the advancement of the rule of law, in building a culture of human rights and in promoting constitutionalism, and on the need for consensus building on vital national matters were presented by Ethiopian experts. Foreign experts were also involved. Participants held intensive and detailed interactive discussions on the main ideas presented. There were also group discussions providing the opportunity for all participants to make contributions on such issues as the strengths and shortcomings of the 2005 election. The media coverage, popular participation and the competition among political parties were identified as some of the strengths of the process in 2005, and electoral violence in the aftermath of the vote and the boycott of some opposition parties from both national and regional legislatures were among the main problems that were identified. The underlying purpose of the forum appears to be indeed very constructive. It is hoped that these kinds of forums would contribute to the strengthening of constitutionalism in Ethiopia and to the further deepening of the tradition of the rule of law, tolerance and mutual understanding between political parties which is critical for the nurturing of democratic culture in Ethiopia. * * * *
Countries
like Ethiopia have had to grapple with many challenges in their efforts to
promote full respect for the human rights of its people. The establishment
of institutions such as the Human Rights Commission and the Ombudsman are
clear indicators of the measure of commitment that the Government has for
the implementation of the ideals of the UDHR. Certainly, human rights
institutions and political structures have a long and arduous road ahead of
them before they can prove their mettle for all, but it’s certainly not an
impossible task. Ethiopia may, as Capital's editorial suggests, have
an edge over some of its neighbors and others, but that is no reason to rest
on any laurels. There is still plenty of room for improvement, a need to
learn from others, and the need for resolution to travel all the way, both
in human rights and democracy. Of course, it is also necessary to walk
before one can run. In this regard, capital is absolutely correct when it
said, "No one is perfect and change is an on-going process”. There are still
millions in abject poverty; there are entrenched cultures not necessarily
conducive for nurturing the ideals of the Declaration. Some might argue that Ethiopia should always feel obliged to respond to all and every criticism from human rights organizations or other international NGOs. That’s understandable, but in what appeared to be the slip of the pen, Capital cited as UN bodies some of those “watchdogs” which are essentially self-designated groups. In fact, Ethiopia enjoys good working relations with UN agencies, with mandates in the human rights area. At the same time, Ethiopia’s commitment to the respect of human rights isn’t just a government ploy to improve its image or gain “access to the cookie jar”. It is a cause written into the constitution, a cause that Ethiopia upholds as a nation and people with full conviction that the obligation to respect human rights is in fact inextricably linked to the need to protect the viability of the nation as so clearly indicated in the country's Foreign Affairs and National Security Policy and Strategy. * * * *
The floor was then opened for questions, comments and suggestions from representatives of civil society organizations, members of the public and members of the House. Most of the speakers accepted a legal framework as envisaged in the draft law was necessary but many expressed concern on some aspects and raised a number of questions. These included queries on the qualifications of the proposed seven members of the Charities and Societies Board envisaged under Article 8 of the draft law; the compatibility of the draft law with the FDRE Constitution as well as with international agreements such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Cotonou Agreement, and the NEPAD Documents and others such as the Protection of Basic Services (PBS); on whether the proposed fines for infringements of provisions were not too severe; on whether it was necessary to apply the law against all organizations irrespective of their size; whether it might be possible to resolve some of these issues by other means; and whether the comments made in the hearing would be considered in the revision of the draft text. Some also expressed concern that the foreign funding issues could harm their employees and their beneficiaries; that they would not be able to raise sufficient funds from Ethiopian businesses unless incentives were introduced and that the article of the draft which limits foreign funding for certain political activities could narrow funding prospects for some local organizations. Participants suggested that the law should address tax exemption issues related to Charities and Societies. The explanations that followed made it clear the Government was not targeting NGOs for closure. It has been working very closely with NGOs in development, and some NGOs certainly merited accolades from beneficiaries and Government alike for their service. Indeed, the Government is firmly convinced Ethiopia must continue to nurture the continued development of active and organized civil society bodies. It was emphasized that misleading information originally seems to have confused those organizations working in the developmental sphere. Their earlier concern that they might be affected was mistaken. Explanations of the objectives and design of the law had allayed their anxieties. Concerns about compatibility with international obligations were also based on mistaken or selective readings of the international instruments. The selective reading of Article 22(2) of International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is a good example. Those arguing that the draft law contradicts ICCPR have misread the Covenant. The Cotonou Agreement is a Partnership Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, on one side, and the European Community and its Member States at Cotonou on the 23 rd of June 2000. The relevant articles governing the participation of civil society organizations in the political, economic and social life of the partner countries show that support to be extended to non-state actors should be done in conformity with the laws of the concerned ACP States. The Cotonou Agreement specifically reiterates the rights of ACP States to determine their development priorities ‘in all sovereignty’, and emphasizes the necessity of taking into account national characteristics in determining whether non-state actors should be provided with financial assistance. The phrase "Subject to the agreement of the ACP State concerned” clearly demonstrates the draft law does not contradict the Partnership Agreement, an agreement providing the framework for dialogue and cooperation. NEPAD similarly provides a framework for civil society participation. The detailed explanations given on Wednesday also made clear that the Government recognizes that NGOs could make meaningful contributions in a number of areas because of the serious shortages from which Ethiopia suffers. Here, NGOs could establish societies. The new proposed Charities and Societies Agency will have a Board, two of whose members will be from civil society organizations and be elected by the organizations themselves. At the conclusion of the public hearing the Chairperson of the Legal Affairs Committee of the House of Peoples’ Representatives expressed appreciation on his own behalf and on that of the three House Standing Committees which had organized the hearing for the participation of members of the public and the civil society organizations. He hoped that this practice of the House of People’s Representatives should be continued and expanded. * * * *
|
|
"A week in the Horn wishes Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all its readers." |