| 4.1
The European Union (EU)
The European Union, which currently
comprises 15 affluent European countries, constitutes a huge market and
is poised to accept 10 more members. This market is comparable in scope
and prosperity to that of the U.S. and in due course, it could surpass
the US. Next to the U.S., it represents the second most powerful market,
determining the rules governing globalization. It is also noteworthy that
the EU has as its main objective, the establishment of peace and democracy.
The development aid we receive from its member states, added to that coming
from the EU (Commission) itself, places the EU as our largest source of
aid. It is also the main destination for our products. As regards investment,
although it is regrettable that the results are so far not encouraging,
there is no doubt that the EU continues to be a huge source of investment
opportunities for our country. Furthermore, this region remains to be
a critical source of assistance for our development endeavor. At this
time we do not see the EU as posing a security threat to Ethiopia. To
the contrary, as the EU and its members have the objective of ensuring
the respect of international law and the promotion of peace and democracy,
we consider them as partners and sources of support in our effort in this
area.
One main concern regarding our relationship
with Europe has to do with our failure to make maximum use of the opportunities
that the region offers. Admittedly, we have not done enough in terms of
exploring sources of credit and aid to finance our development plans and
ensuring that the money thus obtained is properly used. More importantly,
there has been some failure to gear our relations with the EU toward expanding
trade and investment in the country. The main reason for this is our poor
image in Europe. Ethiopia is perceived as a country wracked by protracted
war and poverty rather than a potential destination for investment and
trade, and the efforts deployed to correct the image have not been adequate.
Furthermore there has been little effectively planned work done in terms
of creating an environment conducive to attracting investment.
Since the EU represents one of the powerful
agents shaping the rules governing globalization, there is likely to be
a tendency to regard the EU as a source of the negative influences associated
with the phenomenon. However, it is encouraging to see that the EU has
recently agreed to allow poorer countries, including Ethiopia, free access
to its market without any tariff and quota on entering goods. Nevertheless
the subsidy the EU provides to its firms with which we would have to compete,
and other practices relating to trade and investment, are having a negative
effect on the development of the poor countries.
With respect to bilateral relations,
there are problems caused by attempts to impose options that contradict
the political and economic strategies that we carefully designed to suit
our context.
The strengthening of our relations with
EU, and the maximization of the benefits we could gain for our development
and security, are predicated on the domestic work we carry out in Ethiopia.
Important are the efforts we deploy to implement the development and democratization
strategy we have adopted. We should thus identify gaps in the resources
needed to implement the development plan with a view to determining the
kind of assistance the EU can provide to help fill the gap. Moreover,
we should be prepared to engage in consultative meetings with EU member
states and explain our strategies. Given the fact that our development
strategies are based on democratic principles and are to be implemented
within the framework of globalization, we do not expect them to be in
conflict with the fundamental interests of European countries. It should
also be our policy to try and resolve differences through dialogue and
mutual understanding in a manner that does not jeopardize or compromise
our fundamental strategies and goals.
We should strive to acquire from European
states credits and grants for the development and technical assistance
required by our initiatives, and work hard to ensure maximum and effective
utilization of the resources secured. In due course, our main focus should
shift to trade and investment. Based on detailed and continuing research,
and study we should, find markets for our products and export those that
are in demand in Europe. Work along these lines will also require us to
establish and maintain close contact and cooperation with private investors,
NGOs and states that are ready to contribute. Similarly, steps should
be taken to establish through research the parties that can help us in
our efforts to attract the type and amount of investment we desire, and
to work together with them in a more coordinated fashion. We need to work
hard to change conditions within Ethiopia and cooperate with those that
can help in changing the image of our country.
Europe has a significant role to play
in efforts aimed at ensuring peace, stability and democracy in our region.
Thus, we believe that there is a clear need on our part to make sure that
member countries have a firm grasp of our interests and role in maintaining
the security of the region. We need to consult on issues that crop up
on different occasions, and ensure that we receive sustainable political
and diplomatic support.
Government-to-government relations are
key in our overall relations, but we cannot expect to get comprehensive
benefits in the confines of state sectors. The greatest benefits come
form trade and investment, and the key here is in the hands of the private
business community. We therefore need to widen our focus to include the
governments, the NGOs and the private sector. Our diplomacy in Europe
should aim at involving and even coordinating all three sectors, based
on detailed and continued research studies and analysis. Considering the
EU as a union may be correct, but the role member states play are not
the same. While we should work to maintain good ties with all EU members'
states, we should focus on cultivating extensive ties with major countries,
and those better disposed towards Ethiopia.
Differences that could arise with Europe
have to do with differing appreciations of the policies we pursue to promote
development and democracy in Ethiopia. Some policies may not be pleasing
to European businessmen. Our policies should be drawn carefully and on
the basis of detailed study. Should better options be identified, they
should be pursued unreservedly. We should also be prepared to defend fundamental
policy matters to which we are deeply committed, and we should try to
resolve such differences in opinion by showing the significance and validity
of the policy causing disagreement.
The EU is beginning to take some positive
steps to mitigate the negative influences of globalization. We are also
aware that the people of Europe and non-governmental organizations hold
views that are more supportive towards poorer countries. We believe we
have to take advantage of this and push hard to persuade Europe to work
towards creating a more favorable condition for Ethiopia and the whole
of Africa. Efforts along this line can bear fruit only when African countries
join hands under the framework of the African Union.
|